On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:27:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Insertion on unstable are more or less working; it start working > again one month ago. > > The performance varied from no retries, 4 hours to insert a medium-size > freesite, to 4 retries-40 hours overall lenght. > > Insertion on stable are almost impossible since october; I had > just one success, but the site was irretrievable. > > Toad pointed that poor performance can depend from the small size > of unstable; I'm interested in know more about this statement. > > I had exactly the opposite sensation; that stable is far smaller > that unstable ...
No, stable is huuuge. At least 690 nodes. > > Or at least that the number of nodes accepting insert is far lower in > stable that in unstable; changing htl has almost no effect on timing > in stable insertion attempt. Right. Stable is overloaded. However there may be some insert specific bugs; requests seem to work sometimes... > > I would be very happy if you can publish a complete listing > of tweaking you've done to your freenet.conf to optimize > insertion; your complete reasoning doing each change > would be very interesting too > > Thanks a lot. Marco > > On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 04:58, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:33:58PM +0000, Toad wrote: > > > What happens when you try to insert? The usual very very very long > > > verification times? > > > > Just thought I'd chime in on this subject. Most recently, I'm finding > > inserts are working much better. I have DFI's insert scheduled to begin two > > hours before its DBR rollover, just to be on the safe side. In the past, > > this was absolutely necessary, and often the insert would only complete just > > in time, or even late. This hasn't been the case at all the last several > > days. I'm seeing the inserts finish anywhere from around a half-hour to an > > hour early now. > > > > The node is working beautifully, I must say. It seems the combination of my > > recent JDK update and reconfiguring the node with more conservative limits > > has done a world of good. CPU load (as reported in top) is now hovering > > around 20-30% most of the time, the node is doing very little rejecting, and > > finding lots of stuff that it hadn't in a while. > > > > Definitely positive progress going on here. :-) > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
