I keep hearing this "too much memory", and let me tell you, folks. I
run an old-timey AMD 400 and 192 megs of ram. I leave my machine
running for days with freenet java daemons running constantly and this
is my memory usage:
total used free shared buffers
cached
Mem: 191064 187444 3620 0 11772
27172
-/+ buffers/cache: 148500 42564
Swap: 385520 198376 187144
Total used, including swap: 187+198=385+ megs... not too bad, I'd say.
If I upgraded to 512megs I'd have room to spare. What I have noticed is
that all yous who have mem problems are running some version of Winderz.
No more comments, 'cept, SuSE Linux is available for free download at
www.suse.com.
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 04:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Send Support mailing list submissions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Support digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke)
> 2. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (David Masover)
> 3. Re: Request for help (Toad)
> 4. potential-bug - report (Tobias Bradtke)
> 5. Serious JVM bug. (Nick Austin)
> 6. Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
> (Sheldon Young)
> 7. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (Phillip Hutchings)
> 8. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke)
> 9. Re: Request for help (Toad)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:27:55 +0000
> From: Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Toad wrote:
> > 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
> > This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
> > CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
> > or similar.
>
> Um, yes - we do, dodo.
>
> Ian.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:32:11 -0600
> From: David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> | Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or
>
> No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
> also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
> will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing).
>
> It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet:// URL style
> wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway --
> it's going to be a long address no matter what. All that would do is
> allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can
> already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself. This is
> better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far
> there's only one server.
>
> And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the "privacy features
> auto-set", you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a
> freenet url, and don't do things like caching it. For this, you'd
> probably just specify a particular host:port that is a "freenet url".
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQIVAwUBQBrpewisZLIF6uqOAQJsuBAAiKP95NiE0ByRAwRamefiEB+jNM5d7wPd
> +QTy7x/s+SrhuarMtvnaGjZIjBzHOjv13lMm/3lA6cDlNOQjCLfapktmKN9mxn9l
> qQHE2ELBi8FQaYeuEkESH4M0TFQYpiUv9Zcxa5+IPzSbWOYfrRKoqUUlLHahsEAl
> mIFizhGfjBKRMKmia0YlcMYlUR6psuhBMVgU+A0N7oCHC8CTKeXM4HvMgUp7DOjK
> M1IS5YW1l7mvE0OXj2Y3+7lW6gFPT1L15qdV46OK1lc9JcUii9MD2T3sKf2Tiq0q
> QLNCGgv1voLkz5LLrOzJnZRAVhryE/nmfKVLlsLD1YFv2d8p5/xGhho66FvwDdRb
> uAwmrjK7sLy8HxSJGcsZO5MEhb+4d4nBUzycT2Xc4lnpEjRaoq0yBnDVPnvIfS3A
> a0GtsAuP69BTJKfM7mo+qZlyYjyBvfsztKXFwxx95F3Hq39+AISuEbdrie4TA7Cy
> 8+8MvMfpAoHwC0gUWkuDQLDaKGo8D8HUve2oTZLylhShNvM6wumYUYVx+fL0gViq
> SubnJLi7JLA3ffQ0m24FFjZQJeWAUaddqKnQeTBpNEMDrkigmzPsAens7WnIISvJ
> sA0MF/8TX7pYX+QMfP1AS93+LgbKJUOFCux+aby7CvtIMG3FTxafvZpGWjyqkApW
> 21bVOtLCkNA=
> =f50Y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:52:09 +0000
> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Toad wrote:
> > >2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
> > >This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
> > >CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
> > >or similar.
> >
> > Um, yes - we do, dodo.
>
> I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of
> bandwidth usage.
> >
> > Ian.
> --
> Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
> ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: Digital signature
> Url :
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20040130/62c22436/attachment-0001.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:09:36 +0100
> From: Tobias Bradtke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [freenet-support] potential-bug - report
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> hi!
> sometimes i get this message in my recent-logs:
> ===
>
> Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 20 in queue, 2634 millis since
> enqueued last item, 1988650 maximum waits so far - could indicate
> serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with
> JVM and OS/kernel.
>
>
>
> -- Architecture and Operating System
> Architecture x86
> Available processors 1
> Operating System Windows XP
> OS Version 5.1
>
> -- Java Virtual Machine
> JVM Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc.
> JVM Name Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
> JVM Version 1.4.1_02-b06
>
> -- Memory Allocation
> Maximum memory the JVM will allocate 192 MiB
> Memory currently allocated by the JVM 130.112 KiB
> Memory in use 88.173.880 Bytes
> Estimated memory used by logger None
> Unused allocated memory 45.058.872 Bytes
>
> -- Data Store
> Maximum size 16.000 MiB
> Used space 13.332.364 KiB
> Free space 3.051.636 KiB
> Percent used 81
> Total keys 48097
> Space used by temp files 226.276 KiB
> Maximum space for temp files 5.592.405.500 Bytes
> Most recent file access time Thu Jan 29 16:04:54 CET 2004
> Least recent file access time Thu May 22 19:38:56 CEST 2003
>
> -- Transports
> Current IPv4 address 212.202.207.168
> Current IPv4 port 44294
> ARK sequence number 32
> Last ARK sequence number inserted 32
>
> -- Thread Pool
> Total pooled threads 16
> Available pooled threads 7
> Pooled threads in use 9
>
> -- Pooled Thread Consumers
> Class Threads used
> freenet.interfaces.LocalNIOInterface$ConnectionShell 3
> freenet.node.states.data.DataStateInitiator 4
> freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:true 2
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:01:41 -0800
> From: Nick Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [freenet-support] Serious JVM bug.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I received the following error message on the console where Fred was running.
>
> Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 16 in queue, 2463 millis since enqueued last
> item, 5507 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel.
>
> System Information:
>
> Node Version
> 0.5
>
> Protocol Version
> STABLE-1.49
>
> Build Number
> 5065
>
> CVS Revision
> 1.90.2.50.2.91
>
> $ java -version
> java version "1.4.2_03"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-b02)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode)
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux <name omitted> 2.4.20-28_36.rh9.atsmp #1 SMP Mon Jan 5 22:54:59 EST 2004 i686
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> $ free
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 1030304 480996 549308 0 77448 200248
> -/+ buffers/cache: 203300 827004
> Swap: 1052248 0 1052248
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20040129/1feea67f/attachment-0001.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:15 -0800 (PST)
> From: Sheldon Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
> To: Discussion of development issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> > > 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
> > > This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
> > > CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
> > > or similar.
> >
> > Um, yes - we do, dodo.
> >
> > Ian.
>
> Before anybody thinks Ian wroke up on the wrong side of the bed, dodo is
> the name of the machine. :)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:21:13 +1300
> From: Phillip Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> On 31/01/2004, at 12:32 PM, David Masover wrote:
>
> > | Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko
> > or
> >
> > No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
> > also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
> > will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing).
>
> I am quite aware of what WebKit and Gecko do.
>
> > It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet:// URL style
> > wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway --
> > it's going to be a long address no matter what. All that would do is
> > allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can
> > already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself. This is
> > better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far
> > there's only one server.
>
> Or 192.168.0.1 in my case.
>
> > And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the "privacy features
> > auto-set", you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a
> > freenet url, and don't do things like caching it. For this, you'd
> > probably just specify a particular host:port that is a "freenet url".
>
> And how many browsers do that? Sure, I'm not sure about writing a
> plugin, since most of the time they can only add processing for
> different MIME types, whereas a different browser using a freenet://
> protocol could connect through FCP and do things like simplify
> splitfiles, insertions and the like with an interface that normal users
> could use. Sure, there's things such as fiw, but it's not the easiest
> of things to use. Having the whole feature set in one application would
> make it a lot nicer.
>
> --
> Phillip Hutchings
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.sitharus.com/
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: smime.p7s
> Type: application/pkcs7-signature
> Size: 2098 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20040131/9aafa5c4/smime-0001.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:27:19 +0000
> From: Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Toad wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> >
> >>Toad wrote:
> >>
> >>>2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
> >>>This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
> >>>CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
> >>>or similar.
> >>Um, yes - we do, dodo.
> > I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of
> > bandwidth usage.
>
> It has 15GB/month IIRC.
>
> Ian.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:54:03 +0000
> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:27:19AM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Toad wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > >
> > >>Toad wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
> > >>>This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
> > >>>CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
> > >>>or similar.
> > >>Um, yes - we do, dodo.
> > >I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of
> > >bandwidth usage.
> >
> > It has 15GB/month IIRC.
>
> I doubt that would be enough for full watchme functionality. It'd be
> fine for node registration etc though.
> >
> > Ian.
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
