Nikita.
Michael wrote:
I keep hearing this "too much memory", and let me tell you, folks. I
run an old-timey AMD 400 and 192 megs of ram. I leave my machine
running for days with freenet java daemons running constantly and this
is my memory usage:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 191064 187444 3620 0 11772 27172
-/+ buffers/cache: 148500 42564
Swap: 385520 198376 187144
Total used, including swap: 187+198=385+ megs... not too bad, I'd say. If I upgraded to 512megs I'd have room to spare. What I have noticed is
that all yous who have mem problems are running some version of Winderz.
No more comments, 'cept, SuSE Linux is available for free download at
www.suse.com.
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 04:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send Support mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Support digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke) 2. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (David Masover) 3. Re: Request for help (Toad) 4. potential-bug - report (Tobias Bradtke) 5. Serious JVM bug. (Nick Austin) 6. Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Request for help (Sheldon Young) 7. Re: Way to much RAM! Build 5064 (Phillip Hutchings) 8. Re: Request for help (Ian Clarke) 9. Re: Request for help (Toad)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:27:55 +0000 From: Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Toad wrote:
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?Um, yes - we do, dodo.
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
Ian.
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:32:11 -0600 From: David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or
No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing).
It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet:// URL style wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway -- it's going to be a long address no matter what. All that would do is allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself. This is better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far there's only one server.
And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the "privacy features auto-set", you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a freenet url, and don't do things like caching it. For this, you'd probably just specify a particular host:port that is a "freenet url". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIVAwUBQBrpewisZLIF6uqOAQJsuBAAiKP95NiE0ByRAwRamefiEB+jNM5d7wPd +QTy7x/s+SrhuarMtvnaGjZIjBzHOjv13lMm/3lA6cDlNOQjCLfapktmKN9mxn9l qQHE2ELBi8FQaYeuEkESH4M0TFQYpiUv9Zcxa5+IPzSbWOYfrRKoqUUlLHahsEAl mIFizhGfjBKRMKmia0YlcMYlUR6psuhBMVgU+A0N7oCHC8CTKeXM4HvMgUp7DOjK M1IS5YW1l7mvE0OXj2Y3+7lW6gFPT1L15qdV46OK1lc9JcUii9MD2T3sKf2Tiq0q QLNCGgv1voLkz5LLrOzJnZRAVhryE/nmfKVLlsLD1YFv2d8p5/xGhho66FvwDdRb uAwmrjK7sLy8HxSJGcsZO5MEhb+4d4nBUzycT2Xc4lnpEjRaoq0yBnDVPnvIfS3A a0GtsAuP69BTJKfM7mo+qZlyYjyBvfsztKXFwxx95F3Hq39+AISuEbdrie4TA7Cy 8+8MvMfpAoHwC0gUWkuDQLDaKGo8D8HUve2oTZLylhShNvM6wumYUYVx+fL0gViq SubnJLi7JLA3ffQ0m24FFjZQJeWAUaddqKnQeTBpNEMDrkigmzPsAens7WnIISvJ sA0MF/8TX7pYX+QMfP1AS93+LgbKJUOFCux+aby7CvtIMG3FTxafvZpGWjyqkApW 21bVOtLCkNA= =f50Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:52:09 +0000 From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?Um, yes - we do, dodo.
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
bandwidth usage.
Ian.
-- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://dodo.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20040130/62c22436/attachment-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:09:36 +0100 From: Tobias Bradtke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [freenet-support] potential-bug - report To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
hi! sometimes i get this message in my recent-logs: ===
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 20 in queue, 2634 millis since enqueued last item, 1988650 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel.
-- Architecture and Operating System Architecture x86
Available processors 1
Operating System Windows XP
OS Version 5.1
-- Java Virtual Machine JVM Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc.
JVM Name Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
JVM Version 1.4.1_02-b06
-- Memory Allocation Maximum memory the JVM will allocate 192 MiB
Memory currently allocated by the JVM 130.112 KiB
Memory in use 88.173.880 Bytes
Estimated memory used by logger None
Unused allocated memory 45.058.872 Bytes
-- Data Store Maximum size 16.000 MiB
Used space 13.332.364 KiB
Free space 3.051.636 KiB
Percent used 81
Total keys 48097
Space used by temp files 226.276 KiB
Maximum space for temp files 5.592.405.500 Bytes
Most recent file access time Thu Jan 29 16:04:54 CET 2004
Least recent file access time Thu May 22 19:38:56 CEST 2003
-- Transports Current IPv4 address 212.202.207.168
Current IPv4 port 44294
ARK sequence number 32
Last ARK sequence number inserted 32
-- Thread Pool Total pooled threads 16
Available pooled threads 7
Pooled threads in use 9
-- Pooled Thread Consumers Class Threads used
freenet.interfaces.LocalNIOInterface$ConnectionShell 3
freenet.node.states.data.DataStateInitiator 4
freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:true 2
------------------------------
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:01:41 -0800 From: Nick Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [freenet-support] Serious JVM bug. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I received the following error message on the console where Fred was running.
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 16 in queue, 2463 millis since enqueued last item, 5507 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel.
System Information:
Node Version 0.5
Protocol Version STABLE-1.49
Build Number 5065
CVS Revision 1.90.2.50.2.91
$ java -version java version "1.4.2_03" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode)
$ uname -a Linux <name omitted> 2.4.20-28_36.rh9.atsmp #1 SMP Mon Jan 5 22:54:59 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
$ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1030304 480996 549308 0 77448 200248 -/+ buffers/cache: 203300 827004 Swap: 1052248 0 1052248
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://dodo.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20040129/1feea67f/attachment-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 6 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:32:15 -0800 (PST) From: Sheldon Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Request for help To: Discussion of development issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?Um, yes - we do, dodo.
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
Ian.
Before anybody thinks Ian wroke up on the wrong side of the bed, dodo is the name of the machine. :)
------------------------------
Message: 7 Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:21:13 +1300 From: Phillip Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On 31/01/2004, at 12:32 PM, David Masover wrote:
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko orI am quite aware of what WebKit and Gecko do.
No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
will probably continue to use it (at least for browsing).
It doesn't use http, of course, but adding a freenet:// URL styleOr 192.168.0.1 in my case.
wouldn't change things too much, since you need the key first anyway --
it's going to be a long address no matter what. All that would do is
allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can
already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself. This is
better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far
there's only one server.
And if you wanted to do such a thing, or the "privacy featuresAnd how many browsers do that? Sure, I'm not sure about writing a plugin, since most of the time they can only add processing for different MIME types, whereas a different browser using a freenet:// protocol could connect through FCP and do things like simplify splitfiles, insertions and the like with an interface that normal users could use. Sure, there's things such as fiw, but it's not the easiest of things to use. Having the whole feature set in one application would make it a lot nicer.
auto-set", you would do it as a browser extension -- notice when it's a
freenet url, and don't do things like caching it. For this, you'd
probably just specify a particular host:port that is a "freenet url".
-- Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sitharus.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2098 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://dodo.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20040131/9aafa5c4/smime-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 8 Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:27:19 +0000 From: Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Toad wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:It has 15GB/month IIRC.
Toad wrote:I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?Um, yes - we do, dodo.
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
bandwidth usage.
Ian.
------------------------------
Message: 9 Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:54:03 +0000 From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Request for help To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:27:19AM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:I doubt that would be enough for full watchme functionality. It'd be
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +0000, Ian Clarke wrote:It has 15GB/month IIRC.
Toad wrote:I was under the impression that dodo was rather limited in terms of
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?Um, yes - we do, dodo.
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar.
bandwidth usage.
fine for node registration etc though.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
