On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 05:34:21PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:15:27 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > be distributed more widely. Specifically, if the requestor cancels a > > transfer, we should still transfer the data. Of course this means that > > nodes can DoS the network by requesting data and then cancelling the > > transfer; we will instigate some sort of blacklisting to try to > > discourage this, but it is not an immediate priority. > > Elaborate. Does this mean that a person who's downloading via FUQID and > aborts the transfers (to be able to close FUQID down) might get > blacklisted? How about trying to load lots of Freesites but not getting > anything (fast, at least) and then closing everything down?
No, clients don't get blacklisted. The node would however be punished by the client as it would continue to transfer the data. FUQID is a bit of a pain to the node for this reason :| > > regards, > Troed > > -- > http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
