On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: > "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Now I believe I can live with freenet being slow and that > >> many documents are not immediately available. What is > >> annoying me is that _I_ will have to do the retrying. Why is > >> that not a task for the server? > > > > You sure? I thought we had a meta-refresh tag on those RNF/DNF pages? > > Wont the browser automatically retry the page after a while if you leave > > it to? > > Hi again, > > wanted to try Freenet again ;-) - seems to work quite well. > However, those RNFs are really a PITA. > > Yes, those RNF pages have meta refresh tags on them; however, that > does not help if > > a) one does not use Fproxy for fetching a file
In which case whatever you did use would retry. > > b) the failing file is an image. In that case it just disappears and > you have to reload the page manually until you have all > images. (alternatively, you can open a browser window/tab for every > single image you want to have; IMHO this is no real solution either.) This is what IFRAME is for :) > > For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more > seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately > (and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the > browser or a FCP app) is no good idea IMHO. Maybe so. But maybe the problem is more fundamental. > > mihi -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
