Roger Hayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Schierl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more >>seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately >>(and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the >>browser or a FCP app) is no good idea IMHO. >> > How would you distinguish messages you don't want very much (like > possibly non-existent Frost messages) from ones you do want a lot? By not using Frost? If that is really an issue, one could specify an "importance" flag in FCP. But IMHO that many RNFs are a bug in Fred. > It > is likely to generate quite a lot of extra traffic to automatically > retry all RNFs till you get something, even if the user has gone on to > something else. Not "until you get something", but for some more time. I guess most users will not change their mind if they cannot get a site within a second (which is usual time till RNF for me ATM). mihi _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
