So he should link to the project page, first and foremost. That's called "doing your research". We could release a 0.6.0-pre1, but it'd be dubious...
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 04:23:45PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote: > As I said on IRC, a collegue of mine has made an article (well, actually > more of a reference/pointer/short description) to freenet, and refered to > the sourceforge page. > > Maybe that seems like an obvious mistake, but in any case: why doesn't > anyone who can, update the f- page, there? It's still says 0.5.2.1 with as > date 17 july 2003(!!). Great impression that makes for people that arrive > there. > > Call it worthless what I say, but being mentioned on major putermagazines is > not that easily to brush off. These kind of things will happen again, and > it's a total waste if we don't correct it, which can be done quite easily, > by updating it more regulary. > > I remember, btw, that I've said this before, even long before this article > came out. But I guess it wasn't worth any attention. After all, as I've come > to understand, I never said anything worthwhile. > > And yes, I'm whining. I feel entitled too. > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
