Motion to ban as a troll? On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:39:54AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote: > "So you're saying it should be faster? But even when I used the Freenet > gateways, they were very slow." > > Actually, I was being sarcastic, which you may not have noticed, being a > newbie. If you scroll to my earlier posts on devl or support, you will > notice I've made EXACTLY the point that for noobs Freenet still sucks, > because...well, it sucks. There have been a lot of technical 'improvements' > like NIO and NGR, but some of it is dubious, and all of them have not > contributed to a faster, better working Freenet - which is often disputed by > the Higher Gods, but which is, alas, the truth. > > Your story isn't an exeption. Recently I tried to insert my flog, and it > took about one hour to insert it. But, rest assured, someone will come in > and say it works fanfuckingtastic with on his/her puter. > > But, back into reality-land-with-no-elves-and-fairies, your experience is > quite common. Though, in all honesty, I must say with some (well-integrated) > nodes, fast lines and time of the month (etc.) you can have some freesites > under the two minutes as well. > > > "Win2k, I just downloaded the program complete with the Java machine from" > > I asked the questions mainly pro-forma: it's what is always asked, but > usually the question nor the answer will help much. You got lucky you didn't > get it back 'corrupted' like me. Anyway, guess that'll be a 1.4.x JVM > version. The version is one thing, the build something else. It should be > 5100 (you can see that when you open fproxy), which it probably is. > > OpenConnections you can see on the start to (left), with fproxy, though you > need to go into advance mode (upper right, I believe) first. > > Well, it's a funny thing, with the firewall. I'm still not very clear about > myself. It is supposed to work without a glitch these days; it should handle > NAT and firewalls without a glitch...only it sort of doesn't. It works, but > it doesn't. I'll let a High God explain that one, but rest assured it's full > of 'ifs' and 'thens'. Using UDP might have helped to avoid all that, but ah, > details. > > Anyway, feel free to snoop around at www.freenethelp.org, which has become > quite an elaborate helpsite....which isn't all that surprising, I guess ;-). > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
