-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Someone wrote: > Victor Denisov schrieb: > > | Yes, you have to forward ports if you're behind NAT, regardless of the > | DMZ. All that DMZ really does is that router doesn't perform any traffic > | filtering for it by default, not that it can magically understand that > | connections on this certain port should be forwarded to that specific IP > | address behind NAT. > > Actually it does for most home routers. On those setting a machine into the > DMZ means that every incoming request, that doesn't fit a configured rule > (like a firewall ruleset or an open/forwarded port), will automatically be > send to the machine in the DMZ. >
Hmm. Strange, I was thinking otherwise, but this shouldn't matter. If incoming connections can be established, the node should work reasonably well, regardless. As you've pointed out in another message, your node mostly lives on incoming connections - that's my experience as well, incoming connections are _very_ important. I'd like to advise original poster to still check that his node has incoming connections (or is able to receive them at all). Regards, Victor Denisov. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB/7nE6ORu4LlA94MRAvBSAJ9Dc49VqPf4qWIPt5xIDZCoQbw5kQCgojXs Q3wgQCKTpmxinL2nyfJ6e1U= =sNvm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
