Matthew Toseland wrote:
How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
AFAIK, launch4j (http://sourceforge.net/projects/launch4j) should do the
trick. Most important features for freenet (from their page):
- LGPL
- "process name as the executable filename to easily identify your
application" !!!
- "...wraps jars in native windows executables..." (this might be negative)
- "supports gui and console apps"
- "opens java download page if an appropriate java version cannot be found"
and more...
Doc
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:56:42PM +0400, Danila Medvedev wrote:
Under win2k Freenet (latest version, downloaded webinstall without Java -
Java 1.4.2_06 already installed) connections show up to my firewall
(AtGuard!) as javaw.exe
In process explorer I see javaw.exe as a child process of freenet.exe.
Creating a general firewall rule permitting all outgoing connections
requires me to allow them not just for freenet, but for all java
applications.
This is not very good from a security standpoint. It would be preferable
if this problem (albeit a minor problem right now) was somehow fixed in
the future.
--
Theory asserts that although in theory there should be no
difference between theory and practice, in practice there IS
difference between theory and practice.
Constantine Dokolas
Sunsoft Ltd.
Mimikos Group
Tel: (+30) 210-931.7811
Fax: (+30) 210-932.1603
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
