Matthew Toseland wrote:
So what's the benefit to us then?
Umm... wasn't the original problem something like "how to distinguish a
freenet process from other java processes (under Windows) so that the
firewall can handle it differently"?
The reason I replied to the wrong post is that the original had not arrived
yet.
And, yes, all the replies are off-topic!
Doc
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:41:15PM +0300, Constantine Dokolas wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
AFAIK, launch4j (http://sourceforge.net/projects/launch4j) should do the
trick. Most important features for freenet (from their page):
- LGPL
- "process name as the executable filename to easily identify your
application" !!!
- "...wraps jars in native windows executables..." (this might be negative)
- "supports gui and console apps"
- "opens java download page if an appropriate java version cannot be found"
and more...
Doc
--
Theory asserts that although in theory there should be no
difference between theory and practice, in practice there IS
difference between theory and practice.
Constantine Dokolas
Sunsoft Ltd.
Mimikos Group
Tel: (+30) 210-931.7811
Fax: (+30) 210-932.1603
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
