On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken > > I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet > to > download new stable versions and then quit. > I have the java command that starts freenet in a loop and this suffices to > update > freenet with much of the wrapper's complexity. > It worked fine. > > I would not object to an 'are you sure' message but to block the operation is > not > reasonable. Without the wrapper its reasonable > for someone to want freenet to download new jars and prep them for execution > when the > user restarts. > > Why do we _need_ this reduced flexibility?
A lack of response to your question I note with disdain -- "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland." - Adolf Hitler, proposing the creation of the Gestapo in Nazi Germany. - George Bush, Talking about the Homeland Security Act and the Patriot Act. "The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home." - James Madison, fourth president of the United States I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
