On Tuesday 09 March 2010 20:49:34 Evan Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Dennis Nezic <denn...@dennisn.dyndns.org> > wrote: > > As I (and I'm sure others) mentioned before, my node is still going > > down (crashing?) regularly -- roughly weekly. I currently allocate it > > 150MB of (precious) ram. Here are my last 2 (of infinity) heap reports > > from the jvm dump:
I have filed a bug for this. Please register on the bug tracker and Monitor Issue on this bug: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=4030 The next build should be slightly improved on this, I have just fixed a bug that was using at least 20MB of RAM for no good reason. > > > > Heap > > def new generation total 46080K, used 41323K > > eden space 40960K, 100% used > > from space 5120K, 7% used > > to space 5120K, 0% used > > tenured generation total 102400K, used 99586K > > the space 102400K, 97% used > > compacting perm gen total 12288K, used 11390K > > the space 12288K, 92% used > > ro space 10240K, 61% used > > rw space 12288K, 60% used > > > > Heap > > def new generation total 46080K, used 41400K > > eden space 40960K, 100% used > > from space 5120K, 8% used > > to space 5120K, 0% used > > tenured generation total 102400K, used 102399K > > the space 102400K, 99% used > > compacting perm gen total 12288K, used 11214K > > the space 12288K, 91% used > > ro space 10240K, 61% used > > rw space 12288K, 60% used > > > > Is there NO way that freenet can do a better job cleaning up? (I > > believe this happens even if I don't have (much) currently in the queues > > -- Ie. if I did heavy activity days before -- or maybe even on it's own > > without any manually-initiated activity, although I would have to test > > this more :\.) 150M is a bit low if you have stuff queued - especially inserts. Do you still get OOMs with *nothing* queued? (I suggest deleting or moving out of the way your node.db4o to be sure; if you move it out of the way be careful to move persistent-temp-* as well). Exactly what plugins are you running? Currently the default is 192M. We're trying to get it to be auto-detected but that is not deployed yet. > > > > Maybe we can add more debugging info as to where all the memory is > > allocated? Ie. which structures? (And hopefully decide that we can Let > > Go of some of them :|.) Here's part of what I do: wrapper.java.additional.3=-Xloggc:freenet.loggc (In wrapper.conf) Then tail -f freenet.loggc. If it is constantly doing Full GC's, it is on the edge. At which point, jmap can be very helpful (you might need the JDK): $ jmap -histo -F <pid of freenet> $ jmap -dump:live,format=b,file=dump.filename The latter is particularly useful. You can then do: $ jhat dump.filename This opens a web server on 127.0.0.1:7000 on which you can investigate exactly what is using memory. You could alternatively send me the dump, I'm not sure whether the tools are backward compatible format-wise. Another thing that is helpful is a stack dump (on the stats page, or run.sh dump, or kill -QUIT <pid of freenet>, in any case it goes to stdout). > > What plugins are you running (complete list)? Can you provide a copy > of your full stats page, in advanced mode? Freetalk+WoT needs quite a bit of memory. XMLSpider needs absurd amounts. All of these can be optimised substantially. > > Evan Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
