On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:25:48 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:54:47 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Build 1339 is out. Please upgrade asap, it will be mandatory on > > Monday. The main change in this build is that backoff is now > > separate for realtime versus bulk requests. This means, hopefully, > > that if the performance problems recently have been caused by > > realtime requests causing lots of backoff, this will only affect > > realtime requests. It is investigating a theory, one of several, > > regarding the recent problems. > > > > I am sorry that the network has behaved so badly recently, I am > > working on it, but it is not easy. > > > > Please upgrade, and please report any and all problems you find. > > There is a thread on FMS where I am trying to get a better > > understanding of what problems people are seeing. So far the main > > reported issues seem to be: > > - Realtime requests (e.g. fproxy) are slow, and cause all or most > > peers to get backed off. > > - Downloads are very slow. > > - Bootstrapping onto the network is slow. > > I'm getting lots and lots of Timeouts and Overloads in my > stranger-status details, although not too many BackOffs. After over an > hour of uptime, my bandwidth usage hasn't really stabilized. Even the > upload speeds, which used to be quite stable around my 15KB/s limit, > are very bumpy, quite often near 2KB/s. Same with my download speeds. > (Although, at least they aren't flooding :p.) > > In general, whenever I look at my strangers, most of them will be: > FatalTimeout/SENDER_DIED > FatalTimeout/TransferFailedInsert > FatalTimeout/AfterInsertAcceptedTimeout > FatalTimeout/ForwardRejectedOverload2 > > I've seen a bunch of InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck, TransferFailedRequest > (5,13). > > Is this abnormal, or normal congenstion control? > > I also see that the ping times to my strangers are very high, > 300ms-1000 +ms, even though I can ping google under 20ms. I don't > know if this is abnormal, or perhaps all my peers are on the other > side of the planet, or perhaps the value is calculated differently. > > Also, perhaps unrelated, why was I being connected to 11 peers, with a > 15KB/s connection? Isn't that too high? Although, even after I halved > this, nothing much changed.
(Cool stats btw :b) 1h 28min uptime: nodeAveragePingTime: 883ms # backedOffPercent: 4.9% # pInstantReject: 27.6% Input/Output rates well under my limits. (Average rates under half my limit.) Routing Backoff Reason Count Avg. Time Total Time Timeout 1 7.955s 7.955s TransferFailedInsert 10 7.082s 1m10s FatalTimeout 22 6.158s 2m15s AcceptedTimeout 123 4.990s 10m13s ForwardRejectedOverload4 1 3.016s 3.016s ForwardRejectedOverload5 3 1.614s 4.843s ForwardRejectedOverload 152 1.490s 3m46s TransferFailedRequest5 37 1.459s 54.004s TransferFailedRequest13 2 1.314s 2.629s InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 5 1.219s 6.096s TransferFailedRequest7 2 1.217s 2.435s AfterInsertAcceptedTimeout 2 1.196s 2.392s ForwardRejectedOverload2 20 0.975s 19.519s ForwardRejectedOverload3 1 0.180s 0.180s Transfer Backoff Reason Count Avg. Time Total Time SENDER_DIED 24 1m17s 30m54s _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
