On 02/26/2011 01:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote: > >> The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes. > On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for > smaller communities to run Freenet in order to keep a “clean” network (by > whatever standards).
A good choice of words, "can be required for smaller communities". A good example might be the private boards on the Frost messaging system. By the same token such censorship can also ensure a "dirty" network within a small community. And it's all carried on the same network! Ray
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
