On 02/26/2011 01:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote:
>> The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes.
> On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for 
> smaller communities to run Freenet in order to keep a “clean” network (by 
> whatever standards).

A good choice of words, "can be required for smaller communities". A
good example might be the private boards on the Frost messaging system.
By the same token such censorship can also ensure a "dirty" network
within a small community. And it's all carried on the same network!


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Support mailing list
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to