On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:16:21 +0100, Jep wrote: > In my opinion, it is good for security to use a browser other than > the system default for Freenet keys, a browser without any plugins > and incapable of Flash, activeX sh** and whathaveyou. > > Can there be a way implemented to have everything Freenetwise use > that secondary browser?
The fproxy could intially provide initial html code to test for the presence of javascript / flash / java, etc, but it would only be a bandaid solution to this broad problem. Ideally, you also don't want the browser to be able to do dns resolution, or access anything outside of tcp:127.0.0.1:8888. Some (weird) people might also insist on enabling javashit, so it would probably end up requiring a zillion new preference settings to appease each person's individual security requirements. People working inside virtual machines that already provide proper network-level security will also probably not want any of this clutter. I think a separate list/project should be started to handle freenet environments (special freenet distros, freenet VMs, freenet hardware appliances, etc)... separate from the freenet program itself. _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
