Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  As i understand the whole process of back-off, just by 
observing
   what is happening with my node: There are two numbers, the first is how much
   time is left for the node to be backed off. The second is how much time it
   was backed-off for during this incident. When the first counter reaches 0,
   then it checks whether it can do things correctly now. If not, it then 
increases
   the second number (doubles it?) and then sets the first to that value and
   waits again. If it can communicate, then it decreases the second number and
   things operate normally. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (5.2 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.0 FREENET_FROM_BACKUPMX  Received from the backup-MX server
 0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.5000]
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily 
valid
 1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
 0.5 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
 0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS


--- Begin Message ---
As i understand the whole process of back-off, just by observing what is
happening with my node:

There are two numbers, the first is how much time is left for the node to be
backed off. The second is how much time it was backed-off for during this
incident. When the first counter reaches 0, then it checks whether it can do
things correctly now. If not, it then increases the second number (doubles
it?) and then sets the first to that value and waits again. If it can
communicate, then it decreases the second number and things operate normally.

I wasn't able to catch how the decrease of the duration happens. And wasn't
able to find anything in documentation.

Is there something written about it, and i just missed it?
I am fine with you just pointing me to the Java class where it happens, i'll
read the code.

             - Volodya

-- 
Помогите собрать средства на написания учебника по программированию:
https://boomstarter.ru/projects/volodya/elektronnyy_uchebnik_po_gtkmm_okonnye_pr
ilozheniya_v_c

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to