On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:55:38PM +0100, Volodya Mozhenkov wrote: > I know that you probably hate people asking the same questions over and > over again, i have been reading these discussions and explanations for > quite some time, but can't find an answers to the questions that interests > me. > > Let's say I trust John and Jill. I create my own litte darknet to > distribute highly contravercial vegan recepies, which happen to be illegal > in my hypothetical meat-eaters-only country. Then John, decides to invite > Jason into the darknet... and Jason is an undercover meat-eater. Will Jason > be able to learn about my vegan habbits? If not (i.e. he will only be > connected to John) then John will be the only point of entry for anything > Jason wants to insert/retrieve from the darknet, is that correct?
He will be connected to John. If Jill wants to connect to him too, then she must connect to him and him to her. > > You have also mentioned about joining two different darknets together. Do > you mean that if Jason in our situation is a member of a vegetarian (rather > than vegan) darknet then vegetarian darknetters will be able to receive the > content of vegan darnet? Can that be stopped? (ie Can Jason say, "Yes, i'm > a part of two darknets, but i don't want any crosspolination between the > two"). Sure, he can run two separate nodes. He can then manually migrate content, if he wants to. > > How easy is it to run opennet and darknet at the same time? Will that > require two separate nodes running or can i run one nodes connecting to > both nets? Two separate nodes, otherwise the darknet's apparently working won't show very much. > > How easy would it be to set up a gateway between a darknet and an opennet? While it might theoretically be possible, I would strongly object to it. You can MANUALLY migrate good content, but a gateway node would undermine the whole idea of the darknet. You end up with a few nodes on the edge of the opennet, connected to another few nodes on another edge via the opennet. When the opennet is taken away, as it inevitably will be, they are isolated again. > > Well i think this is about all. > - Volodya -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/16ff1de9/attachment.pgp>
