Doesn't have anything to do with 0.5 as far as I can tell. Except that in 0.5 you don't have to capture PCs to capture people on the network, in 0.7you do, making it quite a bit more secure.
On 8/25/06, Evan Daniel <evanbd at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 8/25/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com <diddler4u at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >It should not be possible to trace them easily. Of course, if his PC > gets > > >captured, that's possible. > > > > If the person was busted their computer would be captured. > > > > I guess the only safe way is to run freenet from inside an encrypted > > (truecrypt or the like) partition or container and just hope freenet > doesn't > > write information outside that container, no matter what the OS. > > I'm confused... is this supposed to be an argument in favor of 0.5??? > > Evan > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060825/4e71aeff/attachment.html>
