I'm currently running a node on a 10Mbit trunk w/ 10G of cache space. Do you think it would be beneficial for those of us who have the resources available to contribute them, even if it does result in ubernodes?
-Derek Matthew Toseland wrote: > Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good thing to have a fairly > homogenous topology, rather than automatically creating ubernodes? > > On Wednesday 24 October 2007 06:00, [Anon] Anon User wrote: > >> In Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >> >>> Freenet 0.7 build 1066 is available. It will be mandatory on the 30th of >>> October. It includes some fairly large changes including: >>> - Merge of JFK, a Summer of Code project to implement a new, better link >>> encryption setup protocol (we were using a form of STS). >>> - The opennet peers limit takes into account connected darknet peers, so as >>> you get more Friends you will lose Strangers. >>> >> Could "opennet peers limit" be made configurable in freenet.ini/conf? >> >> Thanks >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Support mailing list >> Support at freenetproject.org >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
