This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the F.L.U.G. (Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani- admin at firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see https://remailer.firenze.linux.it or https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE----- Message-type: plaintext In Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >Maybe. What would the benefit be? Isn't it a good thing to have a fairly >homogenous topology, rather than automatically creating ubernodes? Not interested in an "ubernode", just that there are times I would like to reduce the limit from the default 20 to 5 or 10 (sometimes even 2 or 3) and then raise it back up when I'm not using the machine for something else. >On Wednesday 24 October 2007 06:00, [Anon] Anon User wrote: >> >> In Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >> >Freenet 0.7 build 1066 is available. It will be mandatory on the 30th of >> >October. It includes some fairly large changes including: >> >- Merge of JFK, a Summer of Code project to implement a new, better link >> >encryption setup protocol (we were using a form of STS). >> >- The opennet peers limit takes into account connected darknet peers, so as >> >you get more Friends you will lose Strangers. >> >> >> Could "opennet peers limit" be made configurable in freenet.ini/conf? >> >> Thanks -----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
