Mel Charters wrote:
>> Content-Type: multipart/signed;
>>   boundary="nextPart1983121.TrFsbus4oi";
>>   protocol="application/pgp-signature";
>>   micalg=pgp-sha1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> On Tuesday 09 December 2008 10:43, Volodya wrote:
>>     
>>>  Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>>  > On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:57, Volodya wrote:
>>>  >> Mel Charters wrote:
>>>  >>> Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to not
>>>  >>> acknowledging packets.
>>>  >>> 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
>>>  >>> even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
>>>  >>> Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
>>>  >>> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or to the support mailing list
>>>  >>> support at freenetproject.org. Please include this message and what 
>>> version
>>>  >>> of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to
>>>  >>> include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>>     * 80.67.126.33:48685
>>>  >>>     * 91.114.90.176:50370
>>>  >>>     * 70.252.130.137:62819
>>>  >>>     * 74.192.11.111:1030
>>>  >>>     * 68.164.92.215:5510
>>>  >>>     * 88.115.66.96:8421
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> Freenet 0.7 Build #1191 r24115M
>>>  >>> Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> May be from #1190. Build #1191 appeared within the last 10 hours.
>>>       
>>  > >>> --
>>     
>>>  >>> Mel Charters
>>>  >> Have you restarted your node since Saturday at midnight?
>>>  >
>>>  > Unfortunately that's now Tuesday...
>>>
>>>  I just got the same thing. I repeat, the bug is still there (although not 
>>> as
>>>  dominant as before).
>>>       
>> "Just" ? Did you or did you not restart your node after midnight GMT on
>> Tuesday?
>>
>>     
> The bug is still there and I restarted at 12:15 GMT Tuesday morning. Details:
> Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to 
> not acknowledging packets.
> 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets 
> even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. 
> Please report it to us at the bug tracker at 
> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or to the support mailing list 
> support at freenetproject.org. Please include this message and what 
> version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not 
> want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) 
> are:
>
>      * 87.96.165.16:12938
>      * 211.31.2.118:32782
>      * 83.99.52.101:2587
>      * 88.175.188.50:10394
>      * 211.31.2.118:32768
>      * 92.132.225.163:38644
>
> Freenet 0.7 Build #1191 r24115M
> Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
>
>   
This one is still seen in build 1192, although it seems to appear less
often (had sometimes around 12 forcibly disconnected with build 1190).

Freenet 0.7 Build #1192 r24161M
Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771

Stacktrace for one of the latest:

    at freenet.node.PeerNode.disconnected(PeerNode.java:1139)
    at freenet.node.PeerNode.onRemove(PeerNode.java:3554)
    at freenet.node.OpennetPeerNode.onRemove(OpennetPeerNode.java:66)
    at freenet.node.PeerManager.removePeer(PeerManager.java:338)
    at freenet.node.PeerManager.disconnect(PeerManager.java:523)
    at freenet.node.OpennetManager.wantPeer(OpennetManager.java:377)
    at
freenet.node.OpennetManager.addNewOpennetNode(OpennetManager.java:249)
    at freenet.node.Node.addNewOpennetNode(Node.java:3662)
    at freenet.node.RequestSender.finishOpennet(RequestSender.java:1135)
    at freenet.node.RequestSender.finish(RequestSender.java:1082)
    at freenet.node.RequestSender.realRun(RequestSender.java:785)
    at freenet.node.RequestSender.run(RequestSender.java:169)
    at freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.run(PooledExecutor.java:190)

Greetz,

AncoL


Reply via email to