Bill Marquette wrote:
On 10/23/05, Kevin Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, outbound NAT rules still don't seem to be working. I set the rule
up with the same settings I had in 0.86.4, moved the rule above the
default rule, applied, made a normal port forwarding rule / firewall
entry and applied, and the traffic still isn't actually coming out of
the WAN interface from pfSense on port 7700 like it's supposed to
according to the rule I set.
Ummm, port forwarding is to send traffic to some IP address to a
different IP address. What you want is "advanced outbound NAT",
unsurprisingly, in the Outbound NAT screen. Works fine for my IPSec
connections, which all require udp 500 as the source port.
--Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to make sure I didn't mistype anything, here's what my config looks
like:
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/3802/untitled1vb.jpg
And a little background... the way this game works is it's
peer-to-peer. Also, it sends packets back not according to the port
that would normally be inside the packet or the port that the main
server reports, but the other client sends packets back to the port that
it looks like it's coming from. So looking at this screenshot:
http://img448.imageshack.us/img448/8843/untitled25fi.jpg
You can tell the port that I'm getting all the traffic on is not 7700.
This means that the port that I'm sending on through the WAN is not 7700
like it should be according to the rule I made. I even doublechecked
that my IP was typed correctly and the settings in my game were right.
I can only get this game working in 0.89.2 if I use 1:1. I got the game
working with advanced outbound NAT in 0.86.4. The same exact setup in
0.89.2 is not working for me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
