On 10/28/05, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No progress yet. Guess having a six-week old kid and a big birthday party
> didn't help :-)

No worries.   1.1 is a long way off.

> Anyway, here's a what I want to get ready for 1.1:
>
> - Capability to create virtual interfaces bridged to physical or logical
> (e.g. vlan) adapters

That should be doable with that script that you sent over.

> Why we'd want to have that:
>
> - Ability to obtain multiple WAN IPs using DHCP (and then use advanced NAT
> features, e.g. for multiple web servers, multiple game hosts requiring a
> specific port, etc.)
> - Serve multiple IP networks on a single physical interface without vlan
> tagging (if you really want to)
> - Multiple IP networks per vlan (no comment)

This would be some neat mojo.

> (no virtual access points such as described in
> http://www.solunet.com/wp/Colubris/WhitePapers/wp_vap.pdf, sorry, guys)
>
> As far as the GUI's concerned, each of those virtual interfaces will look
> like a physical NIC, complete with MAC spoofing capabilities et al.
>
> I'm still trying to get my head around the different scripts, etc. that make
> up pfSense, so I could really use some pointers on where to look for the
> files/scripts that
>
> - is run when configuring the interfaces from the console (the "do you want
> to create vlans now?" one)
> - sets up the vlans and if configs (guess the code for setting up virtual
> ifs should go there)
> - builds the pf rules (might need a rule to pass packets from the physical
> if to the virtual one from what i've seen so far

Look in /etc/rc.initial.   All the menu options feed from that script.

> And I'll need to be able to check to make sure the physical interface is not
> wireless (results could be quite unpredictable).

That's not a problem as in config.xml a interface is marked as
wireless when the user assigns the intefaces initially.

> Thanks for your help and any other tips on what I should be looking out for
> in order not to make my life miserable :-)

No, thank you for doing all the leg work on this.   This is quite
interesting and if we can make it work then it somewhat removes the
need for proxy-arp from what I can tell?

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to