On 10/28/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for your help and any other tips on what I should be looking out for > > in order not to make my life miserable :-) > > No, thank you for doing all the leg work on this. This is quite > interesting and if we can make it work then it somewhat removes the > need for proxy-arp from what I can tell?
We can relatively easily tie this into the Virtual IP screen. A new type 'logical' and allow the IP to be either static or DHCP. I think we need to do some reworking on how NAT happens to make this fully doable (as you've already noticed), but there is a glimmer of light :) --Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
