On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 16:04 -0500, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > > > >Well... You obviously could have checked that and printed the error > >during wizard run. > > dude, these guys are working their butts off, a little more civility > would be appreciated, i'm sure.
Sorry. I did not meant to offend anyone. It is just my answer to "nothing can be done" point. I have limited time to spend on pfSense - I need to make it up and running. I've already found workarounds for most of my problems. I could just keep my findings for myself or I could have them reported with some fix ideas suggested. I know providing the patch is best of all but I currently can't do it - I still however would like to help making pfsense better - which is what i think i'm doing by reporting the problems :) > > >Also I see the interface speed is assumed 10Mbits if it is not set... > >which is pretty rough guess these days :) > > that was my suggestion. it was a fail-safe in case of no valid BW at > all, since that causes bad rules that don't load. Why not to set it to 1000Mbit ? Seriously If you're looking for something fail safe it could be fails safe. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
