On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:15:08 +0200 Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ispánovits Imre wrote: > > > If in this switch I dont't find any possibility to define that tagged port > > ten it means that this switch is unable to do this kind of job, or maybe if > > I > > define a port which belongs to all the defined vlans, as a common one, I can > > use it to connect the nic to? > > If the switch supports VLANs, it must support tagged ports. The actual > terms used might differ: generally, if the interface lets you assign one > port to multiple VLANs, then it's implicit they are tagged. One port can > be assigned as 'untagged' to one and only one VLAN. > > Angelo > Modena - Italy > So, I've tried it with mixed results. As I want to use it with a dual WAN + CARP configuration, I defined 1-4 ports of the switch to "tagged ports" and from the rest configured 5 VLANs (5x4 ports). The two pfSense boxes have 1-1 fxp (intel) cards fro lan and 1-1 xl (3Com) which hosts the 5-5 VLANs for WAN1, WAN2,DMZ, carp sync etc. The carp sync goes fine, but anyhow it goes trough the tagged ports only. I can ping the two dmz addresses of the boxes, but it probably goes tru the tagged ports only as well. But I can't ping any machine in any subnet, which is connected on the switch VLAN ports. What's wrong? How should it be tested? Any hints? Best regards Imre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
