IMHO you don't need CARP for a redundant Bridge when you enable stp
(which is enabled in PFSense)
I testet a "Failoverbridge" with an older version and it worked for
me...
Am 26.06.2006 um 15:59 schrieb Scott Ullrich:
CARP and bridging currently do not work together.
On 6/26/06, Tristan DEFERT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
I recently moved from Linux/Debian/IPtables(shorewall) to pfSense
because of redundancy possibility with pfsync+carp.
I got two computers with the same hardware and 5 Ethernet interfaces
each.
So i set up the 5 interfaces as following:
Master FW:
LAN (private IP 192.168.33.2)
WAN (public IP my.ip.class.3)
DMZCORPORATE (bridged with WAN)
DMZCLIENTS (bridged with WAN)
SYNC (10.10.10.100 dedicaced to CARP)
Slave FW:
LAN (private IP 192.168.33.3)
WAN (public IP my.ip.class.4)
DMZCORPORATE (bridged with WAN)
DMZCLIENTS (bridged with WAN)
SYNC (10.10.10.101 dedicaced to CARP)
And Virtual IPs like this:
Virtual LAN (private IP 192.168.33.1, acting as gateway for LAN
network)
Virtual WAN (public IP my.ip.class.2 with gateway my.ip.class.1
[provider router] )
My question is:
how do i setup the bridge together with virtual IPs ?
i want the Virtual WAN IP to be bridged to DMZCORPORATE and
DMZCLIENTS
I'm a bit confused, and want to know if someone has already realised
such a setup.
Thx a lot for support!
Regards,
Tristan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
kommunity GmbH & Co.KG
Tom Müller-Kortkamp
Netzwerke & Internet
Goseriede 4
D-30159 Hannover
Phone +49 (0)5 11 - 80 72 58 0
Fax +49 (0)5 11 - 80 72 58 10
http://www.kommunity.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
