Just curios, how many ip's do you have? Have you tried setting this up in an isolated network just to see if it works? I had a problem with bellsouth not really assigning all of the ip addresses they claim they did. The first two in the range were reserved, yet they reported them. When i assigned my router to one nothing worked at all. I am just wondering if this may be part of the problem. I will set up a few boxes this weekend without nat just to make sure, but i am pretty sure it does work.
-----Original Message----- From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work. That's the whole point. Please read the documentation, and research 1:1 NAT to see why it will work for this purpose. A. Jones wrote: > I can't set up a 1:1 as the wan interface is on a different subnet > than my lan interface.... > > >> From: "Tim Dickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work. >> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:13:53 -0700 >> >> If bridging is not an option I would recommend setting 1:1 mappings for >> each public address. It will work beautifully and will also allow you >> to set up two separate networks. >> -Tim >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: A. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:29 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [pfSense Support] Can't get basic routing to work. >> >> I can't get the most basic of basic routing to work. >> >> Here's my network setup.... >> >> Intel computer with 512 ram and new xeon. >> Two Intel PWLA8492MT Dual port Gig-E Cards plus 2 onboard intel Gig-E >> ports. >> >> DSL Modem (Subnet A) >> | >> pfSense WAN (Subnet A) >> | >> PfSense LAN (Subnet B) >> | >> Computers with static public IPs (Subnet B) >> >> Bridging is not an option as in the near future I want to cut subnet B >> into two subnets and put each half subnet onto different interfaces. >> >> I've tried going to advanced NAT and deleting all the rules while having >> subnet B on LAN. >> Deleting all the NAT rules while having subnet B on OPT1. >> DISABLING THE FIREWALL!!! while having subnet B on LAN/OPT1. >> >> I just can't get packets to get through..... >> The joke is that it all works fine when I use the default rule created >> for NAT. >> But I don't want or need NAT for this setup. >> I MUST have public, static IPs on the computers.... =o/ >> >> Please help!!!! >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's >> FREE! >> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional >> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's > FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
