Sorry to get into this post, but there is something bugging me here.

I'm about to put into production a new server running the latest version of pfSense available at the page, which is rc2. Now, I'm seeing that if that version gives problems it won't be supported because it's old, and I'm supposed to use a daily snapshot instead?????

Roberto


Holger Bauer wrote:
Please upgrade to a most recent version: http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-26-06/
We won't check for errors if they are not reported using the latest version. RC2 is quite old.

Holger

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Evers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [pfSense Support] kernel panic on 1.0RC2


Hi All,

I have a strange problem on my firewall cluster, when I remove a carp
address the firewall node locks up (repeatable), the machine is left
with a panic message on the console, and can only be brought back to
life with a reboot. After the reboot everything seems fine 
and the CARP
address is removed. I have no idea how to debug this so can any of you
give me pointers ?

Attached is the output of the last dmesg
The network card where the CARP address was configured is 
using the ste
driver and is a 4-port D-link network adapter.
The machines used are Dell PE2850 single processor HTT enabled.

More information can be provided if necessary.

TIA!
Rob Evers

-- 
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"


    

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  


-- 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
|                     Marcos Roberto Greiner                        | 
|                                                                   | 
|         Os otimistas acham que estamos no melhor dos mundos       | 
|         Os pessimistas tem medo de que isto seja verdade          | 
|                                                     Murphy        | 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
|                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]                           | 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to