new snapshots come out at least once a week and sometimes sooner. each one has bug fixes and enhancements in it. I usually upgrade everytime a new snapshot comes out. -Sean
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: support@pfsense.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 > 22:19:23 +0800> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer> > Hi Holger, we > built it on 31st Jan 2007. Has there been significant> change since then?> > > -----Original Message-----> From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:42 PM> To: support@pfsense.com> Subject: AW: > [pfSense Support] Load Balancer> > > 1. What Version of pfSense are you > running? If it's not a recent> snapshot please upgrade.> > 2. Yes, that is > correct.> > Holger> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----> Von: Kelvin Chiang > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2007 12:36> An: > support@pfsense.com> Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer> > Hi > Holger,> > 1. I take back my words. WAN interface fires icmp poll too, but > strange> that the icmp poll fired by OPT1 is found in the states table but > not> for the one fired by the WAN interface. I found this on a "reject" log> > in firewall log. I configured the firewall rule for WAN interface to> accept > "echo reply" and it functions now. It is strange that the OPT1> interface did > not reject the "echo reply" though.> > 2. To make sure again, as long as the > firewall rules make use of one of> the 3 pools (instead of all 3 pools), > everything will be ok?> > Regards,> Kelvin> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 > 7:25 PM> To: support@pfsense.com> Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load > Balancer> > > Regarding 1: we'll check this> > Regarding 2: Yes, you are > right. You typicall want to even create 3> pools for this: one loadbalanced > (WAN+OPT1), one failover WAN to OPT1> and one failover OPT1 to WAN. Then just > create firewallrules to make use> of either of the pools. This way you can > have services that run on both> or prefer the one or other connection.> > > Holger> > ________________________________> > Von: Kelvin Chiang > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2007 11:36> An: > support@pfsense.com> Betreff: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer> > > Hi, I have > some questions concerning Load Balancer and Failover, hope> that someone can > help.> > 1. I have configured the load balancer for 2 physical interfaces > (WAN &> OPT1). I monitor the states table and realized that the icmp packets > for> monitoring purpose were fired only from the OPT1 interface, none from> > the WAN interface. Is this what it is supposed to do? Logically, to> monitor > whether each interface is online or offline, the icmp should be> fired from > each interface respectively.> > 2. If I want the WAN and OPT1 interface to > function both for load> balancing as well as failover, do I create 2 gateway > pool, one with> "Load Balancing" behaviour and other with "Fail Over" > behaviour?> > Regards,> Kelvin> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------> To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------> To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------> To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------> To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline
