pfSense does not support link aggregation, but since it's FreeBSD, you
should be able to do it via lagg(4) (see
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html).
I don't know about doing VLANs too. I _think_ lagg support is coming up
in pfSense, in a later version ... not sure on that, though.
Robby Morris wrote:
I've searched the forums and mail archives, but can't find this
question, specifically, so here 'tis.
We're looking to use pfSense for internal layer 4 firewalling (nat &
access rules). We may exceed 1gb capacity at some point in the future
and would like to know whether pfSense supports NIC Bonding (or NIC
Teaming or Etherchannel or port aggregation, if you prefer). Does
this matter to pfSense? Or, is this simply a freeBSD configuration
and the virtual interface is what is presented to pfSense, regardless
of the number of physical interfaces? Also, say if we bonded 4
interfaces for 4gb of port aggregation, can we also use VLAN tagging
(801.q) to the switch?
Thank you for your help, and if this is covered in the lists/forums
and I missed it, I apologize in advance.
-Robby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
