I'm not sure, but you might be able to modify the rule to match the
ipsec tunnel itself (which is seen on WAN).

--Bill

On Nov 14, 2007 10:41 AM, Wade Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Bill,
>      Follow on question, what is the best way to configure QOS where
> my qVOIPUp que will not get hit due to the WAN interface never being
> seen as the egress?
>
>      Wade B
>
>
> On Nov 14, 2007 6:30 AM, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately we have no way (today) of performing QOS inside the
> > tunnel.   This is due to how IPSec in the FreeBSD kernel works and how
> > altq works.  Also, the enc(4) interface can only block traffic inbound
> > to the firewall over the tunnel.
> >
> > --Bill
> >
> >
> > On Nov 13, 2007 4:25 PM, Wade Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Good afternoon folks,
> > >       So I have A Cisco 7960 (VOIP phone) network booting, pulling a
> > > TFTP config over an IPsec tunnel. The phone can make and recieve calls
> > > fine. At times when I pick up an inbound call the caller can't hear me
> > > right away, this did not happen when using the Cisco ASA so I believe
> > > it is QOS related.. I am noticing that my qVOIPUp que never gets
> > > traffic. Is this because this que is tied to the WAN as the outbound
> > > interface and the WAN never sees the private address because
> > > encryption happens before QOS? If this is the case would it be
> > > possible to use ENC0 or ENCX as the in/out interface instead of the
> > > WAN interface? If my logic isn't totally flawed that would act like
> > > Cisco's QOS pre-classification when using IPSec tunnels with time
> > > sensitive data. By the way thanks to the entire team, I have been
> > > using this product a long time and it is a scalable fantastic product.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Wade Blackwell
> > >
> > > "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than
> > > perception management"
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Wade Blackwell
>
> "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than
> perception management"
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to