Speaking on behalf of the company doing the commercial support, I can safely say that I don't ever see pfSense becoming a for-pay solution. Scott, Chris and the other developers have always been very committed to the open source software community. The reason there is a commercial support option at all is because many companies require it in order to consider implementing a solution. The commercial development side of things is a way for people (or companies) who want to see a particular feature in pfSense and want to reward the developers for doing the work. This benefits everyone since almost all of these development projects find their way into the pfSense system, and the developers are able to see a financial benefit for their time and effort spent. I hope this helps clarify fears that people might have about pfSense. In short, the intent is to give people more options, not less.
-Gary

Sean Cavanaugh wrote:

technically it already is. if you want elevated support, they charge for it. but out of that comes upgrades and feature enhancements of the software for all users. also the rewards programs on the forum for adding functionality that is being asked for. -Sean


------------------------------------------------------------------------

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:34:08 -0800
> Subject: [pfSense Support] License
>
> Since this is becoming more of a commercial project, do we have to worry about this becoming a pay software?
>
>
> Richard Sperry
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your HotmailĀ®-get your "fix". Check it out. <http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to