On 3/12/08, Chris Bagnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Scott. I was under the impression the load balancer was 
> CARP-based, and CARP required a dedicated interface for heartbeating between 
> the servers? One of the servers will not be on the LAN, and may have a 
> latency of ~30ms as opposed to the sub-1ms one would expect on the LAN.
>

No, that is failover.  Load balancing is completely separate.   CARP
does not load balance.

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to