Ah, so I was wondering about that.... So do I have to send it out default? Or can I pick, say - DSL2?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Buechler Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 6:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CP Issue On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Tim Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Finally deploying captive portal at one of our new sites. But am coming > across a redirect issue I'm hoping you can shed some light on. > > BACKGROUND: > I have 3 Wans setup - WAN, DSL, DSL2 > I have 3 Lans setup - LAN, GUEST, PHONE > > I have load balancing setup with DSL + DSL2 for the GUEST WAN > I have Failover setup with WAN -> DSL -> DSL2 for the LAN > > I have squid setup with defaults (non transparent) on LAN ONLY > I have lightsquid installed for reporting > > ISSUE: > > Clients accessing on the GUEST interface are bypassing the Captive Portal > for the redirect ports. PORT 80,443 > They are not able to access non-redirect ports (such as 25 etc) because of > course they have not authenticated. > Multi-WAN and CP have interoperability issues because any rule specifying a load balancing/failover pool or gateway will bypass CP. There may be a work around, there is a ticket open but I haven't had time to look into it yet. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
