On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Veiko Kukk <[email protected]> wrote: > Erwan David wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:30:44AM CET, Veiko Kukk >> <[email protected]> said: >>> >>> Do you have also load sharing or only failover? >>> How are your failover pools configured? >>> >>> --- >>> Veiko >> >> I have both. >> 2 links, Wan and opt1 interfaces. > > I got it working the same way (with load balancer), but I'm not interested > in load balancing/sharing), I only need failover. Simple dual wan faileover > is not working or I'm missing something about configuration.
Or your missing something, I think is the correct statement. Setup a load balancer entry with an active node and a failover node. Use that entry as your gateway in your rules. It's really not rocket science. This feature has worked flawlessly since I implemented it over 3 years ago, with only usability tweaks having been made to it since commit (not counting the major feature changes to it in 2.0). I no longer need the feature having no desire to continue maintaining payment for multiple WAN connections, but it's used by numerous other devs on a daily basis and lots of users. If it were truly "broken" we would have heard about it not only after releases, but during release candidates and betas which are released entirely so our userbase can help perform our quality assurance and make sure that releases are solid. --Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
