[snip]
yes, exactly this way,
2 identical tunnels with different local/remote subnets...
Other settings are identical
a really impotant thing is, that the remote nets are different from
the liocal nets.
otherwise it get routing problems....
Why do I need parallel tunnels when all I need is one? I need a tunnel
from 10.201.17.0/28 --> 66.241.41.0/24. That's it. Its a Cisco at the
other end. The 10.0.1.0/24 is the general LAN and only needs to get out
to the internet. That works fine and has been for over a month. Worse,
I'm not even talking about the VPN, yet. I can't even communicate with
the OPT1 interface reliably. The tunnel is not the problem. When I go
to the webgui and ping machines on the subnet at the other end of the
tunnel sourcing it to the OPT1 interface, the tunnel comes up in a split
second and it passes traffic quite well with minimal latencies.
Curtis
