2009/6/30 Curtis Maurand <[email protected]>: > [snip] > > yes, exactly this way, > 2 identical tunnels with different local/remote subnets... > Other settings are identical > > > a really impotant thing is, that the remote nets are different from > the liocal nets. > otherwise it get routing problems.... > > > Why do I need parallel tunnels when all I need is one? I need a tunnel from > 10.201.17.0/28 --> 66.241.41.0/24. That's it. Its a Cisco at the other > end. The 10.0.1.0/24 is the general LAN and only needs to get out to the > internet. That works fine and has been for over a month. Worse, I'm not > even talking about the VPN, yet. I can't even communicate with the OPT1 > interface reliably. The tunnel is not the problem. When I go to the webgui > and ping machines on the subnet at the other end of the tunnel sourcing it > to the OPT1 interface, the tunnel comes up in a split second and it passes > traffic quite well with minimal latencies. > > Curtis > > >
you need only 2 tunnels for passing 2 subnets from one side to the other.... -- = = = m i c h a e l - s c h u h . n e t = = = Projektmanagement - IT-Consulting - Professional Services IT Michael Schuh Postfach 10 21 52 66021 Saarbrücken phone: 0681/8319664 mobil: 0177/9738644 @: m i c h a e l . s c h u h @ g m a i l . c o m = = = Ust-ID: DE251072318 = = = --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
