> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 4:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balanced Passive FTP? > > Oh, for inbound load balancing, I thought you meant outbound. No, no > way to do that for a range without putting in one for each port. You > can't balance passive FTP port range like that anyway, there's no > correspondence between the state on the control channel and the data > channel, they would likely end up going to different servers.
Yep - inbound! While I respect the marvel that is PFSense's outbound load balancing, I prefer using BGP costs and IS-IS weights at the router. By the way, when will PFSense support OSPF and IS-IS? ;) On topic - failover mode (as opposed to load balanced mode) should work correctly if I can get the virtual servers set up, correct? This is one more reason why FTP sucks. Not that the world needed another one. Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg Sr. Systems Administrator - Atlas Networks, LLC office: 206.577.3078 | suncadia: 206.210.5450 www.atlasnetworks.us | www.suncadianet.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
