On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:13 -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, mayak-cq <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:55 -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Chris Buechler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:05 PM, mayak-cq <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> hi all, > > > > <snip> > > > > Actually that may not be exactly right - I have my tun interfaces > > assigned where I'm seeing that. Is your tun interface assigned under > > Interfaces>assign? > > > > Good Day My Lord, > > > > Yes -- openvpn has an interface declared on the server side :-) > > > > What about the client side? Server side doesn't matter.
Thanks Again My Lord! So -- the client machine is a vanilla "clone" of a 1.23 install -- only custom arguments on client are: ns-cert-type server; verb 4 Which (in theory) shouldn't cause the server to "NAT" the pool address ... Cheers M --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
