On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:42 PM, mayak-cq <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:13 -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, mayak-cq <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:55 -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Chris Buechler <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:05 PM, mayak-cq <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> hi all, >> > >> > <snip> >> > >> > Actually that may not be exactly right - I have my tun interfaces >> > assigned where I'm seeing that. Is your tun interface assigned under >> > Interfaces>assign? >> > >> > Good Day My Lord, >> > >> > Yes -- openvpn has an interface declared on the server side :-) >> > >> >> What about the client side? Server side doesn't matter. > > > Thanks Again My Lord! > > So -- the client machine is a vanilla "clone" of a 1.23 install -- only > custom arguments on client are: > > ns-cert-type server; verb 4 > > Which (in theory) shouldn't cause the server to "NAT" the pool > address ... >
You're not answering my question, is the tun interface assigned under Interfaces>assign on the client? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
