Hi all.

I am about to embark on the construction of a purpose built ambisonic
studio, which will also double as a 5.1 suite.
I have constructed many studios in the past but never one where all the
speaker positions have equal importance. Normally with stereo it is
beneficial for the sides of the space not to be divisible into each other.
The cube being one of the worst examples of this. It is generally better to
have the mix position at one end of the longest side of a room too, which
helps diffuse reflections before they return to the mix position. Also
completely parallel faces aren't good either, (but they also need to
symmetrical and predictable) as of course this creates more reflections.
Wider and higher at the back is generally a good thing. The general idea is
to through all errors behind where they have less importance and where they
can lose there energy more. This also applies to 5.1, where front has
dominance.
The problem I have is that this doesn't seem to a good idea with
ambisonics, as the mix position needs to be central and all angle errors
need to be equal. This actually leans towards the construction of a perfect
cube for simplicity of build, as creating a perfect sphere would be
difficult and space would be lost.
It will basically be a third order set up, but not sure on the exact amount
of speakers yet. I have 4 subs, 25 satellites (120hz roll off) and 10
nearly full range speakers (60hz roll off). Any advice on room shape, and
speaker positioning would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Steve


--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20140308/2e24cabe/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to