Schumacher Marlon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks everybody for your well-considered comments.
> The reason for going for a 2-channel format is compatibility with
> distribution media formats (CD) - and I suppose it will mostly be listened
> to without a decoder.
> The possibility of recovering (2D) B-Format can be very useful, I think
> (although apparently not 100% possible).

Nimbus Records archived most of their
recordings in 2-channel UHJ.  This was fine
until, many years later, they wanted to release
to multi-channel.  Unfortunately, converting
back from UHJ to B-Format (and then to other
formats) cannot be done without loss.

If you archive in 3- or 4-channel B-Format
then you can *immediately* produce
2-channel UHJ from this.  In addition, you
could later release to other formats without any
loss.

You can only gain by archiving in B-Format;
there is no downside.

Regards,
Martin
-- 
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese  stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to