If there is a choice to be made, plausibility is definitely more important than realism - if nothing else, because plausibility is almost always (with due care and attention) achievable whereas realism almost never, or never, is.
Dave On 13 April 2015 at 18:15, James Anthony Enda Bates <[email protected]> wrote: > I think most of the important points have been covered already but in > general I would say that when simulating distance effects, plausibility is > usually more relevant than absolute realism. > Also, the more cues, the better! > enda > > -- www.endabates.net > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150413/7dc6d25f/attachment.html > > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University. These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University Dave Malham Honorary Fellow, Department of Music The University of York York YO10 5DD UK 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150414/fff7c6e4/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
