On 11 Mar 99 at 19:04, Casper Gielen wrote:
> IMHO it's DOS (yes, especially MS-DOS which used to be the best) and
> Apple who should be praised for opening up computing.
DOS and Apple did helped to open up computing, however IIRC MS-DOS
was not the best, it was rather buggy until 3.2. DR-DOS was MUCH
better, but it had only one disadvantage: it costed. So most people
would rather to stick to MS-DOS which came with their PC for free,
and most didnt noticed the bugs or disadvantages as they didnt
used the advanced features anyway..
Or Botton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction has to make sense."
-----------------------------
http://members.xoom.com/dsdp/
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Pop
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Ben A L Jemmett
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Brent Reynolds
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Jeff Owens
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? hammer
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Charles Dye
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Ole Juul
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Or Botton
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Peter Torrano
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Pete
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Ben A L Jemmett
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Pete
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Bernie
- Re: [SURVPC] why a surv. PC? Or Botton
