On 1999-04-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
   >Recently I was given an AST 486 with 2MB RAM, no
   >hard disk and one 3-1/2" floppy. Since I've also got an
   >Everex 286 and an XT lying around which contain useful
   >bits, I would like very much to cobble things together but
   >am a complete ignoramus when it comes to hardware
   >standards, so:

Good idea

   >- Can I simply remove the 5-1/4" high-density floppy
   >drive from the 286 and add it to the 486 without frying
   >anything? (That way, I could keep using some of my huge
   >collection of shareware and "obsolete" programs.)

Yes, that shouldn't be a problem.

   >- Does the 486 require a different kind of hard drive or
   >can I just shove the XT's original hard drive into the "new"
   >machine?

Normally a 486 would use an IDE or a SCSI controller and HD.  The drive from
the XT is most likely an MFM HD.  I am not sure if it would work in a 486.
If it did it would be small and slow.

   >- Would it make more sense to install one of the 2 Seagate
   >40MB hard drives I have lying around for the 286 and, if
   >so, does anybody know what the proper drive definition is
   >(number of heads, cylinders, etc.) since I seem to have
   >lost the paper I once had and the 286's set-up has lost
   >the definition too?

That depends on what type of drives they are.  If they are only 40megs they
might be MFM drives.  If they are MFM drives re-read my answer to the last
paragraph :-)

   >-Would it make more sense to leave the XT intact and try
   >to set it up as a file server, and how could I do this cheaply
   >so as to access the files from both the 486 and my Mac
   >Powerbook 100?

You could use Interlink and Intersvr to access the XT from the 486.  I don't
think a connection can be made with the Powerbook, However, unless maybe it
has Ethernet capabilites.  A Mac group might be better able to answer that,
Though.

   >-Is it likely that the extra 1MB RAM chip from the 286
   >would be a useful addition to the 486, or should I pass the
   >286 on to somebody else and try to scare up additional 486
   >RAM free or cheap?

The 286 has only 1 sinlge meg simm?  I have never had a 286 that uses simms,
but I think they need at least 2 at a time.  The 486 will need 4 at a time,
but might also use the 72-pin variety.  I don't think the memory from the 286
is going to do much for your 486.

   >- What kind and speed of CD-ROM could I add cheaply to
   >the 486 which would be functional enough to use for
   >running a bilingual dictionary or installing CD-based
   >software? (i.e., I don't really need games, music, etc. but
   >would need to look up terms while translating, probably
   >using WordPerfect 5.1 or a text editor.)

I have an old 1x, but I only use it as a cdplayer.  I haven't ever used it
for data, so I don't really know how to advise you on a minimum speed.  I
will say, that I would go with the same interface as whatever HD you decide
to go with, IDE or SCSI.  That way you will need only one card, instead of
2.


   >-Does anyone know where I could find a Y2k compliant
   >BIOS upgrade for the AST and what I'd need to do to
   >accomplish it? or should I not attempt it myself?

I think software will work.  I run DR-DOS 7.02 that is Y2K aware.

   >Then, on the software end:
   >-Is there any form of Linux which is small and relatively
   >easy for a newbie without a lot of RAM? (I gather that the
   >version which fits on a floppy still needs 4MB to run, and
   >I would like to run some applications as well as the OS!)

I'll let one of our resident Linux people answer this.

   >- Given that I need to work rather than play, would it
   >make more sense to stick to some flavour of DOS? (I'm
   >proficient with 3.30 but would love to switch to another,
   >preferably more recent open-source version if it does not
   >involve a lot of bugs and crashes.)

I would try DR-DOS from Caldera, but others exist too.  Caldera is marketing
DR-DOS for the desktop on a secondary basis.  The main target is embedded
applications, so they fix some things slowly that only pertain to the
desktop systems.

   >- Which would you recommend, given that the programs I
   >use mostly work nicely with 3.30 and  640k? (On the
   >other machines, I've used Stacker and kept things running
   >with an old version of Norton Utilities, and I gather that the
   >latter does not work well with DR-DOS in its 1991 version,
   >so any tips and warnings will be very much appreciated.

I would upgrade your DOS to a newer version MSDOS, DRDOS, PCDOS, or
whatever.  A newer version should give you a bit more memory available, and
will provide cd-rom support.  Maybe bigger HD capabilities too, but am not
sure.  I haven't used older versions of DOS enough to have run into
problems.  I know 5.0 is a good version, but I don't recall it having and
kind of CD-rom support.

   >Is there a book you would recommend particularly for
   >somebody like myself (fairly good at mechanical changes but a
   >complete dunce with electronics) who wants to upgrade an
   >old 486? I've got a couple of volumes already but they seem
   >not to explain which parts are compatible with what and don't
   >tackle software issues intelligibly.

How to Upgrade and Repair PC's by Scott Mueller, or Meuller...something liek
that.  I don't know if it gets into software, as I haven't looked, but he
really gets into the hardware.  The book is in a 10th (?) edition and is
being sold in hardcover (really expensive!!)  Maybe you can find it used in
a bit older edition, However.

   >Thank you for all of your suggestions.

Your Welcome :-)

Chad A. Fernandez
Battle Creek, MI


Net-Tamer V 1.11.2X - Test Drive

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.

Reply via email to