Yah, no one can be rite about every thing, I geus when she said "dos is a
waste of time, why would you want to use it?" well, I geus I was ofended.
Knowing enough about win95 and dos I was able to use what ever I had access
to using a screen reader and do the exersises faster than the rest of the
people in the class. If it talked I could use it plane and simple.Dos
talked better than windows 95, so I used it or a dos box more, the real
truble for me is microsoft office, I have "40%" access to the icons on the
screen, and the $700 or $800 screenreaders can't even read the text properly
some times. <wine wine>
The work stations, had to be logged on to or into, password name so on, I
geus you could call them multy user desktop computers because 2 or 3 classes
threw out the course of the day would use them.
Pete
On 1999-05-31 Howard writes:
>At 12:36 PM 5/31/99 +500, you wrote:
>>Hi Will, I thought of the labeling thing like this, earlier than
>>80186 cpu desk top computers wore "micro computers" and 80186 and
>>newer are "miny computers" I think I read it some whear, but am
>>not sure. Any ways whear I am going whith this is the teacher at
>>the one school I went to insists the pentium computers are "micro
>>computers", well, I think that's wrong, I geus it doesn't mater,
>>rite? Pete
>When I formally started to learn BASIC in 1986 at a tech school, my
>teacher insisted that transistors were not solid state devices.
>That teacher is no longer with us.
>NO! I did not do away with him. I even had nothing to do with it.
>I did learn a lot from him, but he couldn't be right about
>everything.
><H T >
><Howard Traxler>
><Technology Specialist>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
><Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.>
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
