Eko wrote:
>Under these circumstances, a BIOS patch TSR is required
>to advance my PC to year 2000, MS-DOS alone won't survive
>the millenium change. So, is this MS-DOS inability to
>deal with BIOS flaw could be categorized as non-Y2K
>compliant?
I guess M$-DOS sees the BIOS year and assumes that the date is incorrect.
But I can't figure out why it then wouldn't change my year to 97 as my BIOS
is presently set (DOS in 89/94/99, Win95 94 and Win 3.x 89)
What if you try DR-DOS 7.0x?
M$-DOS 6.20 "lives long and prosper" ;)
//Bernie
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
