Hammer wrote:
>> ... I'm trying to figure out how to make a HTML validator/changer that
>> works in Win9x (it most be a native program) and fixes FrontPages HTML
>> pages (and with a built in FTP client I know I have a rather big base to
>> sell it on, even if it would cost 100 USD).
>
>A validator alone would be a good thing already - the existing
>"official" ones (W3C's and cast/Bobby) are far too lenient and let
>pass definitely illegal coding.
Really? Well it isn't that easy you know. (But I have only recently gotten
started). Validator first, then the optimizer (but it's probably easier to
make the optimizer).
>*AND* you should set the price tag to at least the double.
>And if it's even a "changer", to US$ 399,- / 599,- for FrontPage users.
Nah, that would not sell as many as I would like to sell. The point would
be that pages would be faster and few companys are interested in that.
Besides, if I did sell it for 599 it would only take a few months before M$
or someone else comes out with one that's sold for "only" 549. Besides, a
program costing 599 would probably need alot of documentation <G>. Most
importantly is the fact that since the target group isn't interested in
valid or fast HTML code the prie needs to be rather low. Perhaps the double
would work, but not much more IMHO.
>Those who need it have too much money anyway to throw through their
>Window$; the more intelligent rest would download the (free) HTML
>specifications and build some macros.
Do you have any idea of the ammount of companies using FrontPage? They
don't have time to even try and use other programs, or some other way of
doing it. Making it easy for them would make them perhaps wanting to buy
the product.
I do agree that they throw away there money on junk.
//Bernie
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
